“As soon as the coin in the coffer rings
The soul from purgatory springs”
Introduction
During
the early church, around the third century, the Church grants a
confessor or a Christian who is awaiting martyrdom to intercede for
another Christian. The first indulgences were meant to shorten the
time of penance1
but later on this practice took to the form of indulgence which
became a common practice within the Catholic Church2.
![]() |
| The sale of indulgences (A) |
An
indulgence is the remission3 granted by the Church of the temporal punishment due to sins already
forgiven. There are two kinds of indulgences, plenary and partial. A
plenary indulgence is the remission of all the temporal punishment
due to our sins while a partial indulgence is the remission of part
of the temporal punishment due to our sins. Though we cannot do
anything for other living persons, but we can “gain indulgences for
the souls in Purgatory4
(Father McGuire, Baltimore Catechism No. 2, page 188).”5
The Catholic Church taught that Purgatory does not purge mortal sin
(deadly sin). One who dies in a state of mortal sin goes to hell, not
purgatory. The purpose of Purgatory is to purge any venial sins (less
serious sins) that “'remain at the time of death, and the “remains
of sin” or the temporal punishment due to sins previously confessed
and forgiven'” so that a venial sinner “may be purified to meet
God's satisfaction” by suffering.6
To receive remission from God the
offender has to go through all the four processes of penance which
consist of “contrition of heart, confession to the priest, works of
satisfaction prescribed by the priest, and absolution by the
priest.”7
History
of Indulgences
What
happened in Luther's time or even to a man long before his time with
regard to indulgences does not always mean the same thing today. Back
then, indulgences were not always defamatory. In fact in the early
Church, “lapse into sin” results in alienation from the
fellowship and re-instatement was done publicly by confessing before
the congregation and how a person repented was shown by certain
“'satisfactions', a word found as early as Tertullian (d. 220) and
Cyprian (d. 258).”8
The satisfactions are often in the form of fasting, alms-giving, or
the freeing (manumission) of a slave. Its nature was always open to
extenuation or sometimes even pardoned based on the penitent's heart
condition and the expression of these extenuating grace were the
“honourable beginning of the system which came to be known as
indulgences and they must be reckoned as sound psychological and
spiritual practice.”9
![]() |
| The Pope signing and selling indulgences (B) |
And
it was in retaliation to this that Luther counter back with his
famous Ninety-Five Theses
(1517) “condemning
what he saw as the purchase and sale of salvation.”22 Luther not only denounced such acts “as worldly but denied the
Pope's right to grant pardons on God's behalf in the first place: the
only thing indulgences guaranteed, Luther said, was an increase in
profit and greed, because the pardon of the Church was in God's power
alone.”23
As it is, Luther
was not all alone in fighting against the practice of indulgences but
there were others too who had always been protesting against the
whole idea. The Waldensians and the Cathari “would not touch
indulgences” and among the theologians, “only Abelard rejected
them until Wyclif” showed up and in the fifteenth century “eminent
professors in the universities (Ruchrath of Basel, Martinez of
Salamanca, Gansfort of Gröningen, Laillier of Paris and Vitrier of
Tournay) declared firmly against them”24
too.
There is a “common misconception” in many people that the Catholic Church believes in the doctrine that “indulgences forgive sins” but on the contrary the Catholic Church teaches that “indulgences only relieve the temporal punishment due because of the sins,” hence, a person will still require to undergo penance in order to remit his sins to receive salvation.25 On January 1st 1967,
Pope Paul VI, by the bull of Indulgentiarum doctrina at the Second Vatican Council, revised and clarified “that the Church's aim was not merely to help the faithful make due satisfaction for their sins,” but its chief aim was “to bring them to greater fervour of charity.”26 In that bull the Pope states that “Indulgences cannot be gained without a sincere conversion of outlook and unity with God.”27 In 1562 by the Council of Trent the practice of abusing indulgences were put to an end but not to the doctrine itself.28 However, on 4th December 1563, during the final session, ““the Council addressed the question of indulgences directly, declaring them “most salutary for the Christian people”, decreeing that “all evil gains for the obtaining of them be wholly abolished”, and instructing bishops to be on the watch for any abuses concerning them,”” and some years later, in 1567, Pope Pius V abolished “all grants of indulgences involving any fees or other financial transactions.”29
There is a “common misconception” in many people that the Catholic Church believes in the doctrine that “indulgences forgive sins” but on the contrary the Catholic Church teaches that “indulgences only relieve the temporal punishment due because of the sins,” hence, a person will still require to undergo penance in order to remit his sins to receive salvation.25 On January 1st 1967,
Pope Paul VI, by the bull of Indulgentiarum doctrina at the Second Vatican Council, revised and clarified “that the Church's aim was not merely to help the faithful make due satisfaction for their sins,” but its chief aim was “to bring them to greater fervour of charity.”26 In that bull the Pope states that “Indulgences cannot be gained without a sincere conversion of outlook and unity with God.”27 In 1562 by the Council of Trent the practice of abusing indulgences were put to an end but not to the doctrine itself.28 However, on 4th December 1563, during the final session, ““the Council addressed the question of indulgences directly, declaring them “most salutary for the Christian people”, decreeing that “all evil gains for the obtaining of them be wholly abolished”, and instructing bishops to be on the watch for any abuses concerning them,”” and some years later, in 1567, Pope Pius V abolished “all grants of indulgences involving any fees or other financial transactions.”29
Questions to Reflect:
1.
Many Catholic writers would put the whole blame for this general
situation (indulgence) on the greed, thirst for power, and lusts of
the flesh of secular rulers who undermined every attempt at reform.
While many Protestant writers would tend to blame the same faults in
clergymen, from the pope down. Why is it so?
2.
It would not be too much on my part on the extend of saying that many
of the evangelists, missionaries, pastors and bishops in our churches
today abused their power similar to the sale of indulgences in the
distant past by the popes. Sometimes spiritual sin of simony or
misuse of power for donation and fund raising for the sake of
building Churches, ministry or buying new equipments driven my selfish motives could happen.
Is this not the same sin of indulgence?
Endnotes
1
Penance
is an act of contrition or punishments that one endures or performs
to show regret of his/her sin.
2
Catholic Church here refers to the universal church or one
church over most of Christianity.
3
Remission
is the pardon of or forgiveness of sins.
4
The Catholic Church defines Purgatory as “The state and
place of punishment where the temporal punishment due to sins
previously forgiven must be endured, and the guilt of unrepented
venial sins is cleared away from the soul of the person dying in the
state of grace.” (New Catholic Dictionary page 224). It comes from
the Latin “purgare” which means “to cleanse, to purify, to
purge.” Paul Juris, The Other Side of Purgatory (Nystrom
Publishing Company, Maple Grove, Minnesota-55369) 1981, 8.
5
Paul Juris, The Other Side of Purgatory, 1981, 37-38.
6
Paul Juris, The Other Side of Purgatory, 1981, 8-9.
7
The Protestant
Reformation and Its Influence:1517-1917
(Published by Order of the General Assembly, Philadelphia, The
Wesminster Press) 1917, (these words appeared under the Historical Statement), 11.
8
James
Atkinson, Martin
Luther and the Birth of Protestantism,
(Penguin Books Ltd, Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England) 1968, 142.
9
Ibid.
10
James
Atkinson, Martin
Luther and the Birth of Protestantism,
1968, 142.
11
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/indulgence
(Accessed
on 29th
November, 2012)
12
James
Atkinson, Martin
Luther and the Birth of Protestantism,
1968, 143.
13
Ibid.
14
Ibid.
15
Ibid.
16
Ibid.143-44.
17
Ibid.144.
18
The
idea of the treasury of merits was that the good deeds of the saints
had built up a great spiritual capital available to everybody, and
that the sacrifice of Christ was sufficient to wipe out the debits
of all.
19
James
Atkinson, Martin
Luther and the Birth of Protestantism,
1968, 145.
21
James
Atkinson, Martin
Luther and the Birth of Protestantism,
1968, 149.
22
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indulgence
(Accessed on 30th
November, 2012)
23
Ibid.
24
James
Atkinson, Martin
Luther and the Birth of Protestantism,
1968, 144-45.
25
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indulgence
(Accessed
on 30th
November, 2012).
28
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/indulgence
(Accessed
on 29th
November, 2012)
29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indulgence
(Accessed on 30th
November, 2012)
Picture Credits


This article reads, “Condemning what he saw as the purchase and sale of salvation.” This quote describes the undaunted integrity of Luther as he stood against the papacy re propagating that a sale of indulgences can redeem a dead sinner's soul from purgatory into heaven. This practice confers power and wisdom in the hands of the seller of indulgence (papacy, the fathers and pope) and also it exalts the buyer of indulgence (the member of the church)in lieu of God who pioneers, instigates, and orchestrates salvation and all its indomitable package. Believe it or not, today, Christians from the Evangelical front don't sell or buy indulgences, but we are somehow guilty of relegated salvation to the level of it being sought after and received "cheaply." Cheaply in the sense that: A sinner is taught to have the leeway to swim into the pool of salvation on a silver platter without confession and without denying him or herself of past attitudes and sins. Confession of sins, Baptism, and discipleship, these sacrosanct elements that drive one from the past into the future, are played down and downplayed by many Evangelical churches. For my money, the above examples are no different from the past obscenities staged by the Roman Catholic Church. it is high time we who are branded as Twenty-first century Christians, girded our loins to stand up for the truth inscribed in the scriptures so that good and true doctrines will be relished and cherished like the spirit and lifestyle of MARTIN LUTHER. God bless YOU!!!
ReplyDeleteThank you for your valuable insights. Yes, it was Luther who finally got the courage to oppose to the evil practice of indulgences that has become a plague infiltrating into the walls of common houses and civil society. God finally did raise up a man for Himself in the person of Luther the great Reformer.
DeleteIf it's true that Christian leaders today are selling their services to fund a personal project then they are no different from those earlier popes. Talks about using God's words and people for business is sad and enraging. Thank God for the Reformation Movement which brought major changes in the church.But,the Reformation is still not over. Let us all be prayerful and watchful that we ourselves will not fall to temptations of greed, lust,or any mortal, venial, temporal, etc other name some people like to call "sin". "Therefore let him who thinks he stands take heed that he does not fall." 1 Cor.10:12
ReplyDeleteOur teachings, doctrines need to be re-examine whether we are RC or in the Protestant circle (Evangelical). We must have a encourage to stand up for the TRUTH (which is the teaching of the Word of God). And labor not for fame, nor power, and wealth but for God's glory.
ReplyDeleteAmen brother!
DeleteWow... Good Citation Bro! Interesting topic, informative yet due to our biases there is a big tendency to be judgmental in this topic. I wonder what would the other side will say about this. God bless bro.
ReplyDeleteYou are right Jay when you say that we tend to be judgmental and often become bias but my intention here is to be in the middle-ground and see what others are saying/thinking about this because the next blog that i wanna pen is to give my own perspectives based on Biblical standings. Thank you anyway.
DeleteThis is a good research work.
ReplyDeleteit is a known traits of man that we tend to do things for our personal gain or benefits, this is also a reminder that we need more people who have a big heart to live for others, give to others, and yes God will uplift that servant,
My understanding is that instead of being a judges to others action, it will be more better if we are our own judge, cos the bible does not allow us to judge others.
Nothing more than what the Bible says, and Nothing less than what the bible says.
God bless Brother.
Good work, br! I agree with you that there are evangelists, missionaries, pastors and bishops in our churches today, who abuse their power, but i would not consider it similar to the sale of indulgences. Nevertheless, your blog is a good appeal to the christian leaders to examine themselves and make proper use of the power and authority given to them-to serve other and not to be served.
ReplyDeleteIts a challeging topic that can be critically analised. In my point of view, donation and appeal for contribution to the church members by the church leaders for church construction, purchasing equipments that are necessary for the smooth functioning of the church would not be considered indulgences unless it is ask on the basis of payment for sin. For even in the old testament, Isrealites were ask to bring whatever they can to build Jerusalem temple.
ReplyDeleteYes, that's true. If it is motivated by a genuine cause for the greater glory of God's name, there is nothing that we can whisper or condemn to make a mountain out of that mole-hill. In fact, it was necessitated, initiated and willed by God for the Israelites to bring the required construction materials for building the tent or Temple based on their own free-will. And it is on this basis that we Christians especially the leaders should be careful because they can be misled and enticed easily by the love of riches and wealth rather than God. It is to such people (particularly) that I warned of this "Indulgence."
ReplyDelete